A recent legal battle in Ohio has captured attention as a man challenges the issuance of a civil protection order against him, claiming it was unjustly obtained and violated his rights. The case, filed by Missy Robson on behalf of South Central Ohio Job and Family Services (SCOJFS) against Corey Mason, was heard in the Vinton County Court of Appeals. On November 25, 2025, the court denied Mason’s appeal to vacate the civil protection order.
The origins of this case trace back to May 14, 2025, when Robson filed a petition for a civil stalking protection order (CSPO) under R.C. 2903.214 to protect three minor children in SCOJFS custody from Mason. An ex parte CSPO was initially issued, followed by a full hearing on May 20, where the court extended the CSPO until May 20, 2028. Despite being present at the hearing with his counsel, Mason later argued that he did not knowingly waive his rights and that the order lacked sufficient factual findings or evidence of danger.
Mason’s appeal rested on two primary claims: first, that the trial court erred by issuing a CSPO without adequate evidence or findings of present danger; second, that his waiver of rights was neither knowing nor voluntary due to coercion and inadequate representation during simultaneous criminal proceedings. He further alleged procedural irregularities and claimed his health condition impaired his understanding during the process.
The appellate court dismissed these arguments, noting that Mason had waived his right to contest the CSPO through an agreement facilitated by legal counsel. The court found no merit in Mason’s claims about coercion or improper conduct during proceedings. Furthermore, it highlighted procedural errors in Mason’s filings and emphasized that he failed to provide new evidence or legal grounds justifying relief from judgment.
Ultimately, the court upheld its original decision to maintain the CSPO against Mason for three years. This outcome underscores significant legal principles surrounding due process and waiver validity in civil protection cases.
Representing SCOJFS were William L. Archer Jr., Vinton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Amanda K. Miller, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney. Corey Mason represented himself pro se in this appeal. The case was presided over by Judge Michael D. Hess with Judges Smith and Abele concurring in judgment under Case No. 25CA706.
Source: 25CA706_Robson_v_Mason_Opinion_Ohio_Court_of_Appeals.pdf