EcomX LLC, a sports supplement company, has filed a lawsuit against Nufacturing Inc., accusing the Ohio-based manufacturer of failing to deliver nearly $80,000 worth of custom-formulated supplements. The complaint was filed on November 11, 2025, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. EcomX alleges that despite repeated attempts to resolve the issue, Nufacturing has neither delivered the goods nor refunded the payment.
The lawsuit stems from an order placed by EcomX on March 13, 2025, for approximately 2,900 bottles of supplements through Nufacturing’s website. EcomX paid $78,300 for the order and an additional $2,500 for drop-shipping charges. However, over six months later, EcomX has not received the products or any satisfactory timeline for their delivery. The complaint details multiple attempts by EcomX to communicate with Nufacturing regarding the delay. On September 5, 2025, EcomX’s counsel sent a letter to Jordan Adair, believed to be Nufacturing’s owner, demanding clarity on the order status and setting deadlines for delivery.
In response on September 19, Adair informed EcomX that production was scheduled but did not meet promised dates. Further communications revealed that Nufacturing struggled due to being a new company and offered partial refunds and product shipments as solutions. Despite these offers and counterproposals from both parties throughout October 2025, no resolution was reached.
EcomX claims significant financial losses due to this delay as its business model relies heavily on timely product deliveries. These delays forced EcomX to incur additional expenses related to marketing and operational adjustments while terminating contracts with several team members hired in anticipation of product launch.
The lawsuit accuses Nufacturing of breach of contract and unjust enrichment. It seeks damages exceeding $75,000 plus attorneys’ fees and interest under both counts. The breach of contract claim argues that Nufacturing failed its obligations by not delivering the ordered supplements or providing refunds upon request—actions also seen as breaching Ohio’s implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing inherent in contracts.
Representing EcomX are attorneys Robert D. Shank and Richard J. Sarcone from Frost Brown Todd LLP based in Cincinnati. The case is identified under Case No.: 1:25-cv-02446 with proceedings presided over by an unnamed judge at this stage.
Source: 125cv02446_Ecomx_LLC_v_Nufacturing_Inc_Complaint_Northern_District_Ohio.pdf
